userland: add archive tools and pinned GoAWK, esbuild, and QuickJS

2026-11-07 10:56:29 +00:00
parent 7e7e49bfa2
commit d79b2bc2e1
1798 changed files with 562969 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:21:19 +0100
+# From: Hermann Peifer <peifer@gmx.net>
+# Subject: [Fwd: Gawk length(array) bug]
+# To: bug-gawk@gnu.org
+# Cc: Aharon Robbins <arnold@skeeve.com>
+# Message-id: <47DBE96F.1060406@gmx.net>
+# 
+# See below. Regards, Hermann
+# 
+# -------- Original Message --------
+# Subject: Re: Gawk length(array) question
+# Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:02:03 -0500
+# From: Ed Morton <morton@lsupcaemnt.com>
+# Newsgroups: comp.lang.awk
+# References: <47DBAE29.4050709@gmx.eu>
+# 
+# On 3/15/2008 6:08 AM, Hermann Peifer wrote:
+# > Hi All,
+# > 
+# > The Gawk man page says:
+# >  > Starting with version 3.1.5, as a non-standard extension,
+# >  > with an array  argument, length() returns the number
+# >  > of elements in the array.
+# > 
+# > It looks like Gawk's length(array) extension does not work inside 
+# > functions. Is this a bug or feature or am I missing something? See the 
+# > example below. I am using GNU Awk 3.1.6
+# > 
+# > $ cat testdata
+# > CD NAME
+# > AT Austria
+# > BG Bulgaria
+# > CH Switzerland
+# > DE Germany
+# > EE Estonia
+# > FR France
+# > GR Greece
+# > 
+# > $ cat test.awk
+# > 
+# Populate array
+NR > 1 { array[$1] = $2 }
+
+# Print array length and call function A
+END { print "array:",length(array) ; A(array) }
+
+function A(array_A) { print "array_A:", length(array_A) }
+# > 
+# > $ gawk -f test.awk testdata
+# > array: 7
+# > gawk: test.awk:8: (FILENAME=data FNR=8) fatal: attempt to use array 
+# > `array_A (from array)' in a scalar context
+# > 
+# > BTW, there is no such error if I have asort(array_A) or asorti(array_A) 
+# > inside the function.
+# > 
+# > Hermann
+# 
+# I get the same result with gawk 3.1.6 for cygwin. Obviously you can work
+# around
+# it since asort() returns the number of elements in an array just like
+# length()
+# is supposed to (or "for (i in array) lgth++" if you don't want to be
+# gawk-specific) but it does seem like a bug. Anyone know if there's a list of
+# known gawk bugs on-line somewhere?
+# 
+# 	Ed.
+# 
+#